Circular No. 7217 Central Bureau for Astronomical Telegrams INTERNATIONAL ASTRONOMICAL UNION Mailstop 18, Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A. IAUSUBS@CFA.HARVARD.EDU or FAX 617-495-7231 (subscriptions) BMARSDEN@CFA.HARVARD.EDU or DGREEN@CFA.HARVARD.EDU (science) URL http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/iau/cbat.html ISSN 0081-0304 Phone 617-495-7244/7440/7444 (for emergency use only) GRB 990704 J. Heise and J. in 't Zand, Space Research Organization of the Netherlands (SRON), Utrecht; G. Celidonio, G. Scotti, and G. Gandolfi, BeppoSAX Science Operation Center, Telespazio, Rome; M. Feroci, P. Soffitta, and L. Piro, Istituto di Astrofisica Spaziale (IAS), CNR, Rome; and E. Palazzi and L. Amati, Istituto Tecnologie e Studio Radiazioni Extraterrestri (ITESRE), Bologna, report: "A gamma-ray burst with a bright x-ray counterpart triggered the BeppoSAX Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor (GRBM) on July 4.7294 UT and was simultaneously detected in the Wide Field Camera (WFC) unit 1. The burst lasted for about 40 s in the 2-26-keV WFC data and had three peaks with increasing intensity. The WFC peak intensity corresponds to a flux of 6.2 Crab. The 40-700-keV GRBM flux is weak and has a similar duration. A peak of 320 counts/s is coincident with the maximum intensity in the WFC. The WFC- determined position and error circle of the x-ray counterpart to GRB 990704 is as noted on IAUC 7214 (99-percent confidence level), which includes a potential 4' error in the satellite attitude." M. Feroci and G. Gandolfi, IAS, Rome; L. A. Antonelli, Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma; M. R. Daniele, C. De Libero, L. Di Ciolo, and V. Torroni, BeppoSAX, Rome; F. Frontera, ITESRE, CNR, Bologna; and J. Heise, SRON, report on behalf of the BeppoSAX Team: "The BeppoSAX Narrow Field Instruments observed the region of GRB 990704 from July 5.064 to 5.989 UT. One previously unknown x-ray source (1SAX J1219.5-0350) was found inside the 7' BeppoSAX WFC error circle at R.A. = 12h19m27s.3, Decl. = -3 50'22" (equinox 2000.0, error radius 1', 90-percent confidence level). The average source flux at 2-10 keV was (8.0 +/- 0.6) x 10**-3 counts/s, corresponding to about 4.4 x 10**-13 erg cm**-2 s**-1, assuming a power-law spectrum. The source shows a fading behavior, strongly suggesting that it is the x-ray afterglow of GRB 990704." Regarding their report on IAUC 7214, A. Maury et al. write: "We have observed the field of GRB 990704 again during the night of July 5-6. The optical object reported on IAUC 7214 is still visible at the same position and seems to be not variable (see also GCN 367, 370, 371); it is therefore very likely not the optical counterpart of GRB 990704." (C) Copyright 1999 CBAT 1999 July 6 (7217) Daniel W. E. Green