GRBs with optical afterglows

This table is completely outdated, and presently not foreseen to be updated. For an updated list of all GRBs until end of 2004 see the following two references:
Zeh, A., Klose, S., & Kann, D. A. 2006, ApJ 637, 889
Kann, D. A., Klose, S., & Zeh, A. 2006, ApJ 641, 993


This table provides a summary of the power law indices of the temporal decay of the optical afterglow emission in GRBs. Links have been added for each GRB to the corresponding "devoted" GRB page (under the GRB name), the reference, mostly astro-ph or GCN (under the decay index), as well as to the GIF figure when available (third column).

GRB Name
powl decay index
Fig.-link
comments
GRB970228
-1.10±0.10
Fig. SN bump(1); SN-subtracted: -1.73±0.12 (Fig.)
GRB970508
-1.21±0.00
Fig. plateau for 1st day
 
-1.17±0.04
Fig.  
GRB971214
-1.20±0.02
Fig.  
GRB980326
-2.00±0.10
Fig. SN bump(2)
GRB980329
-1.29±0.19
Fig.  
 
-1.14±0.15
  mean of R and K band
GRB980425
linear
Fig. SN Ic
GRB980519
-2.30±0.12
Fig.A Fig.B R band; 2.05±0.07 (Fig.) in I band
GRB980613
-1.00±0.00
   
 
-1.30±0.00
   
GRB980703
-1.17±0.25
Fig.  
GRB990123
-1.44±0.07
Fig. 9th mag flash; beaming break
 
-1.12±0.03
Fig.  
GRB990308
-1.2±0.1
   
GRB990510
-0.82±0.02
Fig. beaming break; polarization
 
-0.76±0.01
Fig.  
GRB990705
-1.68±0.10
Fig. H band
GRB990712
-1.03±0.02
  SN bump(1) (Fig.)
GRB991208
-2.15
   
GRB991216
-1.22±0.04
Fig.A Fig.B  
GRB000131
-1.2±0.2
   
GRB000301C
-0.90±0.04
Fig. A Fig. B first 5 days: -0.9, then 1.93; diff. decay in K band
GRB000418
-1.22±0.08
Fig.  
GRB000630
-1.1±0.3
Fig.  
GRB000911
-1.49±0.14
Fig.  
GRB000926
-1.65±0.02
Fig. first 2 days -1.65, then 2.51±0.17
GRB001007
-2.19±0.14
Fig. only after >3.5 days
GRB001011
-1.4±0.1
   
GRB010222
-1.24±0.02
Fig. first day -0.72, then -1.24±0.02
GRB010921
??
Fig. SN bump? possible break at 35 days
GRB011121
-1.66±0.06
Fig.A Fig.B break around 1 day; early decay with -1.6, later with 2.73
GRB011211
-0.8
Fig.  
GRB020124
-1.6
Fig. around day 15 steepening to <-1.9
GRB020305
-1.3
Fig. possible break around day 10
GRB020322
     
GRB020331
-0.67±0.1
   
GRB020405
-1.52±0.12
Fig. SN bump
GRB020813
-1.4±0.02
  change of slope from -0.55 over 0.75 to -1.4
GRB021004
-1.00
Fig. flat at beginning; strong chaotic variability
GRB021211
-0.82±0.11
Fig.A Fig.B first 10 min steep decay (-1.8), then -0.82±0.11
GRB030115
     
GRB030226
-0.62±0.19
Fig. break after 0.5 days, then -1.95±0.26
GRB030227
-1.00
   
GRB030323
     
GRB030328
-1.00±0.1
   
GRB030329
-1.70±0.04
Fig. several re-brightenings, varying power law indices
GRB030418
-1.3±0.1
   
GRB030429
-1.0
   
(1) If the light contribution of the supernova component is taken out, then the resulting decay slopes are steeper (appended in the fourth column) than given in the second column which i.g. represents the mean decay law over all times of the GRB afterglow light curve.
(2) In GRB 980326 the SN bump occurred late enough to not affect the fit for the first day's decay law.


Back to JG's homepage or the GRB page
Jochen Greiner, last update: 18-May-2006
[Disclaimer]